Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
christiane [2024/04/11 11:54] christiane possenigchristiane [2024/04/16 09:56] (current) christiane possenig
Line 50: Line 50:
  
 ===== Critique ===== ===== Critique =====
-While we can successfully restore biodiversity, structure, and function to a degraded ecosystem, ecological restoration is not a substitute for conservation, nor should the promise of restoration be used to justify destruction or unsustainable use. In reality, restoration may not succeed in re-establishing the full assemblage of native species or the full extent of the original ecosystem’s structure and function.+"While we can successfully restore biodiversity, structure, and function to a degraded ecosystem, ecological restoration is not a substitute for conservation, nor should the promise of restoration be used to justify destruction or unsustainable use. In reality, restoration may not succeed in re-establishing the full assemblage of native species or the full extent of the original ecosystem’s structure and function." \\
  
  
 +[[https://www.wri.org/insights/people-centered-ecosystem-restoration|6 Ways to Ensure Ecosystem Restoration Prioritizes People]] \\
 +"As big finance announcements make international headlines, activists and researchers are questioning long-held assumptions and shedding light on failed projects that created limited (or zero) benefits for biodiversity and carbon storage. A small number even harmed fragile ecosystems like grasslands through ill-advised tree-planting campaigns. 
  
 +One common theme lies behind most of those failures: Local communities — and the marginalized groups within them — were not leading the projects and received few, if any, of the rewards."
 ===== Further Reading ===== ===== Further Reading =====
 https://ser-rrc.org/what-is-ecological-restoration \\ https://ser-rrc.org/what-is-ecological-restoration \\